To make a realistic formula, we will need the Average Life Expectancy of a dragon as well as its development and various points.Īccording to Matau, we can use the following bits of information to give us a good comparison Īge at which they can physically reproduce. The ratio is closer to 10.5 years for the first 2 and 5.2 afterwards since then) A more realistic formula is 10.5 years for the first 2 and 4 every year after. After that point, a dog only ages at about 4 human years a dog year. by the time it turns 2, it is the equivalent of a 21 year-old human. The famous "dog years" to "human years" ratio, 7:1, was derived by using life expectancies (that ratio is closer to 6.07 since then), but that isn't an accurate formula.Ī dog develops significantly faster in its first 2 years. To come up with a better ratio, you might then expect to discard the Maximum Lifespan and use just the Life Expectancy, but this isn't quite accurate either. Specifically, weakening of muscles, lowering mobility, poor sensory acuity and age-related diseases are signs of an animal showing senescence." Īnimals exhibiting Negligible Senescence, such as Crocodiles, only die due to diseases, accidents, or predators. In simpler words, you could call it ‘aging’. "Senescence is a term used to indicate gradual deterioration of the body with age.
They have what is known as Negligible Senescence.
The trick with coming up with a good ratio, is that dragons have no maximum lifespan. There are a couple ways to make generic estimate ratios, and they are to compare the life expectancy between the species or to compare the maximum lifespans. I would like to find a more accurate comparison. I was trying to find a realistic ratio for the "Human Years" to "Dragon Years" conversion, and chat suggested that majority of users have just been using a 1:2 ratio.
0 kommentar(er)
